This would allow them to continually attempt to save Minuti, the boat, Kuchever and even Carlin himself, without ever having to send someone back in time. So actually you would never be bound by watching one event precisely four hours ago because you could keep sending notes back in time to yourselves. They receive the note and have accumulated knowledge. If they don't know enough yet, watch it from another aspect, learn some more, add to the note and send it back again Tell them to watch the event with this added knowledge, or if they have enough knowledge stop the event.Describe what they have learned watching the past event.Prove that the note comes from themselves in the future.If they watch an event four hours in the past, they can just write down the relevant information on a piece of paper and return it to their own lab four hours in the past. I'm sure if you didn't think about it in the film you've suddenly thought about it now. When they discover that they can send a note back those four hours the simple option is revealed, and it really is simple. The special team keep talking about how they can only see the exact moment four hours in the past, no other time, they can't go back further or forward, they get one chance. So, let's just talk about the big issue that kept popping up in my head throughout the film, oh and this is your last chance, this is filled with spoilers that will give away the ending and the twists. So if you came directly to this page, look away before you read any further, if you're reading this from the feed or through the front page, don't click on the link. To save you all though, none of this is in the opening blurb and it's all in the main story. I'm also going to point out the biggest flaw in the whole idea that just kept coming back to me and making me wonder why they didn't try it just once. Think of Deja Vu as a guilty pleasure that might help you realise you are a sleepwalker.Okay, so here's the post that's going to go into very serious spoilers for the ending of Déjà Vu (Filmstalker review) and discuss why the whole film, which was running close to a five rating for the majority, dropped to a two in the last five minutes. It’s uncertain what the producers wanted us to think after watching: that sleepwalking or a spiritual spouse is justifiable for a DNA result that claims a person is not the father of a kid or that women who obsessively stalk their husbands due to the intuition that he is cheating on them are correct. The picture quality allows for a mini cinematic experience-the sound, not so much as viewers hear distracting buzzing in the background.įinally, the moral message of the film gets lost. Technicalitiesĭeja Vu’s cinematography is relatively good for its assumed budget. The performances of the actors help conceal the above, as some tried to add layers of complexity through the facial expressions of the characters. The revelation that the kids are a product of sexual infidelity between past lovers is good, but it would have been great if we had seen earlier interactions between the lovers or at least a flashback to help us understand their love that spans several decades properly. READ ALSO: MOVIE REVIEW: A Lot Like Love: “Whodunnit” kidnap story gone wrong However, this feat is soon dismissed by the writer’s inability to fully flesh out the idea or create nuances that would propel viewers to stay on the edge of their seats. While this becomes tiring, it would be hypocritical not to appreciate the fresh take on Deja Vu by introducing the concept of sleepwalking. Growing up, we watched the storyline “That’s not my kid” reoccur in Yoruba films. When she does this, she sleeps with a particular man, hence the reason for her pregnancy. After several spiritual consultations, it was revealed that Bimbe sleepwalks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |